<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expelled Expellings and Other Nonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2008/expelled-expellings-and-other-nonsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2008/expelled-expellings-and-other-nonsense/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John the Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2008/expelled-expellings-and-other-nonsense/#comment-75365</link>
		<dc:creator>John the Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2008/expelled-expellings-and-other-nonsense/#comment-75365</guid>
		<description>How is registration through a &lt;i&gt;public&lt;/i&gt; website, with no restrictions on access, with exhortations to attend and bring guests, and with the specific disclaimer that &lt;i&gt;no tickets were needed&lt;/i&gt;, consistent with your characterization of this event as being "by invitation only"?

Both Myers and Dawkins have emphatically denied the claim that they were given the questions in advance.  Given the other misrepresentations by the producers of this film (e.g., that it was to be called "Crossroads"), you will understand why I find Myers and Dawkins more credible.

Moreover, your final assertion is false.  While I am not familiar with the others in the film, the debunking of Richard Sternberg's claims has been thoroughly documented.  He abused his position as a journal editor, and violated the editorial policy of the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, but this did not result in his firing.  This is merely another misrepresentation by the cdesign proponentsists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is registration through a <i>public</i> website, with no restrictions on access, with exhortations to attend and bring guests, and with the specific disclaimer that <i>no tickets were needed</i>, consistent with your characterization of this event as being &#8220;by invitation only&#8221;?</p>
<p>Both Myers and Dawkins have emphatically denied the claim that they were given the questions in advance.  Given the other misrepresentations by the producers of this film (e.g., that it was to be called &#8220;Crossroads&#8221;), you will understand why I find Myers and Dawkins more credible.</p>
<p>Moreover, your final assertion is false.  While I am not familiar with the others in the film, the debunking of Richard Sternberg&#8217;s claims has been thoroughly documented.  He abused his position as a journal editor, and violated the editorial policy of the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, but this did not result in his firing.  This is merely another misrepresentation by the cdesign proponentsists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
