Eugenic Abortion

Filed under: Apologetics, Current Events — Barry Carey at 2:15 pm on Saturday, May 10, 2008

Al Mohler has a post here in which he reflects upon a phenomenon gaining increasing acceptance… eugenic abortion. The impetus for his reflection is the recent birth of Trig Paxson Van Palin to the governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin. Trig has Down’s Syndrome, a condition for which prenatal screening is now routine and often leads to the killing of the unborn baby. According to Mohler:

The Palins never considered aborting the baby. That means that Trig Palin is now is a very rare group of very special children, because it is now believed that the vast majority of babies diagnosed with Down syndrome before birth are being aborted.

Modern diagnostic tests are driving a “search and destroy mission” to eliminate babies judged to be inferior, disabled, or deformed. Some experts now believe that up to 90 percent of all pregnancies diagnosed as having a likelihood of Down syndrome end in abortion.

Back in 2005, ethicist George Neumayr commented: “Each year in America fewer and fewer disabled infants are born. The reason is eugenic abortion. Doctors and their patients use prenatal technology to screen unborn children for disabilities, then they use that information to abort a high percentage of them. Without much scrutiny or debate, a eugenics designed to weed out the disabled has become commonplace.”

Of this “defective” baby, Governor Palin states:

I’m looking at him right now, and I see perfection.

Kudos to the Palins for their decision which bucks this disturbing eugenic trend.

5 Comments »

76840

Comment by T Lieberman

May 11, 2008 @ 2:36 pm

Just a question: Is the word “eugenics” normally applied to free individual decisions about one’s own pregnancy?

My understanding is that, given a distinction between voluntary family planning and compulsory family planning, “eugenics” usually refers to the latter. Not sure if you really want to erode that distinction.

76841

Comment by Christina

May 11, 2008 @ 5:35 pm

The point, Lieberman, is that both the mother in choosing abortion, and the doctor in encouraging abortion, and society in tolerating abortion, are in the case of Down syndrome doing it for eugenic reasons — to rid the world of people that they, personally, consider inferior.

It was eugenics that took abortion from an abomination to a right in the US. I’ve been spending the past weeks delving through historic newspaper archives, and in the 1960’s there’s a sudden change of tone. All of a sudden, the abortion stories are no longer of women dying and doctors getting arrested. The stories are all about how horrible it is that it’s hard to get women through loopholes in the law to allow them to abort.

Why the sudden switch? Two words: Thalidomide. Rubella.

Society was so squeamish about “defective” people being born that the perception shifted. Abortion was no longer a horror: babies were. Inferior babies. Defective babies. Unsightly babies. Yuck!

And this was back before any kind of prenatal testing could tell if the baby was one of these “monsters” or not. Just the suspicion that the baby might be of the undesirable kind was reason enough to take his or her life.

We can say that back in the 1960s we weren’t embracing tolerance and diversity. What’s our excuse now? If your body is different, or your mind works differently, or you have some genetic quirk, it’s off to the pathology lab with you, kid! What’s our excuse for that?

76842

Comment by Barry Carey

May 11, 2008 @ 10:15 pm

Eugenics is a word that has been applied in a wide variety of circumstances. I am not uncomfortable in applying it in this case, understanding that it also has other applications.

This is not an individual family planning decision with which we are dealing, by the way. As noted by Christina, there is a concerted effort to abort Down’s Syndrome patients in order to decrease the incidence of this disease and make the human race “better.” This is eugenics.

76866

Comment by Gatsby Blastyn

May 12, 2008 @ 4:33 pm

Has anyone heard of the “special diet” in Israel?
I don’t know how true this is or not. But a friend of mine who lived in Israel for 5 years noticed that he hadn’t come across any physically disabled or mentally disabled children. He raised the concern with the family he was staying with and they informed him about the “special diet”…. which if I understand correctly involved starving those unfit children.
Again, this could be complete hogwash - but I was curious if anyone heard of it.

77037

Comment by T Lieberman

May 21, 2008 @ 1:18 pm

Christina & Barry: When an woman decides to abort the fetus she is carrying, we can’t assume how she feels about other people raising disabled children. We can only assume that she, personally, does not want to raise that particular child. Her decision might be based on her unwillingness to see the child suffer, or on her inability to afford the child’s healthcare, which are not the same as a belief that the world should be “rid” of disabled people. A movement to influence women to choose abortion may well exist, but we cannot make that assumption simply because many women are choosing abortion. We would need more information that was not supplied in the original blog post.

Gatsby: It seems unlikely that Israelis would starve unwanted newborns, especially because abortion is legal there. According to Wikipedia, each abortion must be approved by a committee. One acceptable reason is a suspected birth defect; 17% of abortions are approved for this reason. Israel seems to have the same overall abortion-per-capita rate as the US. The 2008 population estimates (men and women of all ages) are 7.3 million for Israel and 304.1 million for the US. The 2003 government reports of the number of abortions performed are 19,500 for Israel and 854,122 for the US. So, given that abortion is just as common in Israel as in the US, and that fetal abnormalities are a legal justification for abortion, there would be no more reason to starve babies in Israel than there would be here in the US.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>