An Evangelical Is…

Filed under: Apologetics — Barry Carey at 9:50 am on Tuesday, May 20, 2008

A few days ago, I posted on the Evangelical Manifesto, a recent document signed by a number of leading evangelicals which hopes to clarify what it means to be evangelical. John Mark Reynolds, in his post What is an Evangelical?, addresses this same issue. I like this portion of his overall discussion:

Evangelicals are committed to reason. They love books, ideas, debates, and finding things out. All over America millions of Evangelicals will attend seminars by philosophers such as William Lane Craig or theologians such as John Piper. When they are losing an argument, they think harder, adapt, and try again.

Like all post-moderns, they too are tempted by anti-intellectualism, but there is a cottage industry of books, such as those by J.P. Moreland, calling them back to their better selves.

Evangelicals want the truth. Not for them are soft platitudes that hide problems. If they became persuaded that their religious ideas were wrong, they would change their minds. For Evangelicals part of faith is a kind of knowledge. They care about being right and hope to avoid being wrong.

Of course, Evangelicals know that reason has limits. They know intellectualism is just as dangerous as fundamentalism. In a mixed up and complicated world, Evangelicals are practical and suspicious of rigid, Utopian ideologies that don’t take into account fundamental human ignorance.

2 Comments »

Comment by Vinny

May 20, 2008 @ 12:28 pm

The way that I know Christianity is true is first and foremost on the basis of the witness of the Holy Spirit in my heart. This gives me a self-authenticating means of knowing Christianity is true wholly apart from the evidence. And therefore, if in some historically contingent circumstances, the evidence that I have available to me should turn against Christianity. I don’t think that that controverts the witness of the Holy Spirit. In such a situation, and I should regard that simply as a result of the contingent circumstances that I am in, and that if I were to pursue this with due diligence and with time I would discover that in fact that the evidence—if I could get the correct picture—would support exactly what the witness of the Holy Spirit tells me.William Lane Craig

This sounds to me like a guy who is going to believe what he believes regardless of the evidence.

Comment by Barry Carey

May 21, 2008 @ 7:59 am

Vinny,

I’ve read several of Craig’s books and I think you have to take the above quote in the context of “justified belief”. (Both he and Plantinga deal with this issue in more depth elsewhere.) He is making the argument that one’s belief can be justified even if some evidence seems to count against it based on an even more compelling evidence (for that individual)of the witness of the Holy Spirit. He certainly does not think that this evidence would count much for someone who does not have the witness of the Spirit. I don’t think that he would state that this evidence should convince anyone else of the truth of Christianity.

Others do not place such an emphasis on the self-authenticating witness of the Spirit and would find evidence against the truth claims of Christianity much more troublesome.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>