http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/the-women-at-the-tomb/ Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:33:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/the-women-at-the-tomb/#comment-13863 Barry Carey Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:33:58 +0000 http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/the-women-at-the-tomb/#comment-13863 Point well taken. I tend to do that frequently, not intentionally of course. Point well taken. I tend to do that frequently, not intentionally of course.

]]> http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/the-women-at-the-tomb/#comment-13862 havoc Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:25:35 +0000 http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/the-women-at-the-tomb/#comment-13862 I would only change "obviously implying other women present" to "<i>possibly</i> implying other women present," or "obviously <i>not excluding</i> other women <i>being</i> present," which does not weaken the defense, but does not overstate the case. I've found that I create the greatest trouble for myself by overstating my case where it is not extremely well supported. I would only change “obviously implying other women present” to “possibly implying other women present,” or “obviously not excluding other women being present,” which does not weaken the defense, but does not overstate the case. I’ve found that I create the greatest trouble for myself by overstating my case where it is not extremely well supported.

]]>