<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Postmodernism or Absolutism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/postmodernism-or-absolutism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/postmodernism-or-absolutism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/postmodernism-or-absolutism/#comment-35574</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/postmodernism-or-absolutism/#comment-35574</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Not only is postmodernism unlivable, but it is self-referentially incoherent.&lt;/i&gt;

Yet that doesn't seem to stop many people from continuing to speak and think in these categories.  They're comfortable in their inconsistency--or they haven't troubled to think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Not only is postmodernism unlivable, but it is self-referentially incoherent.</i></p>
<p>Yet that doesn&#8217;t seem to stop many people from continuing to speak and think in these categories.  They&#8217;re comfortable in their inconsistency&#8211;or they haven&#8217;t troubled to think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
