Jesus’ Family Tomb

Filed under: Apologetics, Current Events — Barry Carey at 9:25 pm on Tuesday, February 27, 2007

On Sunday, March 4, at 9 pm, the Discovery Channel will air a feature on the “so-called” tomb of Jesus’ family called The Lost Tomb of Jesus. This special presents the claim that the bones of Jesus, his mother, his brothers, his wife, and his child have all been found. This, of course, would be quite disheartening to Christians whose faith is based on the bodily resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth.

However, the Discovery Channel special turns out to be much ado about nothing. I would recommend two assessments of this affair. One, found here, is by respected New Testament scholar, Ben Witherington III. The other, more concise and readable for the average person, written by Paul Maier, professor of ancient history at Western Michigan University, is found here.

Long story very short:

1. This information is not new. Scholars have known about these findings since 1980. There has been no great noise because the findings are insignificant.

2. The names on the ossuaries are all very common names and in no way can be identified as Jesus Christ and family members.

3. There is no tradition whatsoever – Christian, Jewish, or secular – that any part of the Holy Family was buried at Jerusalem.

HT: Mark Roberts

8 Comments »

Comment by Joe

February 27, 2007 @ 9:39 pm

I guess it is true that a prophet has no honor in his own country.

So far, only the press in Witherington’s native Kentucky have delicately raised the issue of the pot calling the kettle bla…that is, the pot calling the ossuary cracked in Witherington’s overheated protestations (the gentleman protests too much, methinks)against the latest “biggest New Testament find”* in his lifetime.

Lexington County Herald, 2/27/07 http://www.kentucky.com/mld/heraldleader..

On his blog, Witherington fired a final salvo by referring to the Titanic and saying Cameron “has now jumped on board another sinking ship full of holes, presumably in order to make a lot of money before the theory sinks into an early watery grave. Man the lifeboats and get out now.”

In 2003, Witherington and co-author Hershel Shanks, editor of the Biblical Archaeology Review, wrote in The Brother of Jesus that they believed an ossuary bearing the inscription “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus,” was authentic.

A few months after The Brother of Jesus was published, Israel’s Antiquities Authority decided that the ossuary was a fake. It charged the ossuary’s owner, Oded Golan, with fraud and illegally selling archaeological artifacts outside of Israel. His trial continues, 21/2 years after it began.

Witherington said that he and Shanks stand by their conclusion that the ossuary is authentic and are not likely to change their minds, regardless of the trial’s outcome.
—-

“This is probably going to be the biggest New Testament find in my lifetime, as big as the Dead Sea scrolls,” said Ben Witherington, a New Testament professor at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky.
National Geographic News http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/..

If Witherington can be such a zealot about HIS OWN wacky claims about HIS OWN phony ossuary, it would only be sporting of him to cut Simcha Jacobovici (Witherington’s former partner in crime. He was the man who helped Witherington create and hype a documentary about his own phony “James Ossuary” about 4 years ago.) and James Cameron some slack.

Comment by Jillian

February 28, 2007 @ 12:21 pm

Here’s the official site for information and original interview footage of Simcha Jakobovici: http://www.jesusfamilytomb.com

Comment by Chris Rosebrough

March 1, 2007 @ 1:43 am

I’ve written a comprehensive rebuttal to claims and evidence of this film. Please read it and decide for yourself.

You will find it at extremetheology.com

Comment by Jonathan

March 4, 2007 @ 4:17 pm

I read a great article about this from str.org [the url is http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7109 ]. Stand to reason’s ‘review’ said much about the quality of information presented in the documentary and it’s reliability.

Comment by Jonathan

March 4, 2007 @ 4:34 pm

After looking at the official site I do have to give them some sort of ‘props’ for at least attempting to “include” the chrisitan faith regardless of the quality of the information.

Comment by David Rogers

March 7, 2007 @ 1:58 am

Why is it that Christians continue to cling to the life support that is thier crumbling religeon! Perhaps they believe they are impervious to the same fate that befell many religeons they violently eradicated. Evolution is a fact, scientifically and imperically proven. Jesus was made into the spitting image of Mithras, an earlier diety who was born on Dec. 25th, Born of a Virgin and a God, martyred, and ressurected. Are Mr Jacobivici’s findings a fraud? There is no question about the authenticity of the ossuaries. They were found, insightu, by Israeli Archaologists, catalogued and documented! This isn’t just some claim! This was painstakingly researched with Doctors, Statistitions, and DNA specialists. There is no certainty that this is the Jesus Family Tomb, but I guarantee it is a better certainty than Christianity itself!

Comment by John Lake

March 7, 2007 @ 2:07 pm

I would like to comment on Mark Roberts article - Have They Found the Tomb of Jesus?. You can always find arguments to support your belief system and disregard other arguments that do not fit in with your beliefs. This is only natural. Because he only chose to choose quotes from people that would like to discredit the documentary it is clear where he stands. I found the film to have a very compelling argument. The filmmakers truly believed they ‘may have’ found something profound. They are not saying it is definitive proof but encourage discussions and further scientific study. It amazes me how many had their minds made up before it even aired…. I’ll continue to view this issue with an open mind and the question.. what if?
John

Comment by Gene

March 11, 2007 @ 1:10 pm

I do not believe in religion Thank God

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>