<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cumulative Case Apologetics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/cumulative-case-apologetics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/cumulative-case-apologetics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: withallyourmind.net &#187; My Apologetics Strategy</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/cumulative-case-apologetics/#comment-33350</link>
		<dc:creator>withallyourmind.net &#187; My Apologetics Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/cumulative-case-apologetics/#comment-33350</guid>
		<description>[...] Doing Apologetics (Intro) Classical Apologetics Evidentialist Apologetics Cumulative Case Apologetics Presuppositional Apologetics Reformed Epistemology Apologetics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doing Apologetics (Intro) Classical Apologetics Evidentialist Apologetics Cumulative Case Apologetics Presuppositional Apologetics Reformed Epistemology Apologetics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/cumulative-case-apologetics/#comment-32392</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/cumulative-case-apologetics/#comment-32392</guid>
		<description>As a scholar of world religions, I really like this approach.  It may be impossible to compare worldviews on a consistent point by point basis, and everyone has their pet objections, so any presentation has to be a network of interconnected points.  Individual points may be subject to relativistic attack, but the entire structure is self-supporting.  

Making a list or catalog of those points would be quite the task. It would need to address issues philosphy, science, psychology, and other religions, I would think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a scholar of world religions, I really like this approach.  It may be impossible to compare worldviews on a consistent point by point basis, and everyone has their pet objections, so any presentation has to be a network of interconnected points.  Individual points may be subject to relativistic attack, but the entire structure is self-supporting.  </p>
<p>Making a list or catalog of those points would be quite the task. It would need to address issues philosphy, science, psychology, and other religions, I would think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
