<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creedal Conclusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/creedal-conclusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/creedal-conclusion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barry Carey</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/creedal-conclusion/#comment-16480</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/creedal-conclusion/#comment-16480</guid>
		<description>Aaron,  Yes, that is what I mean.  Creeds,used incorrectly, could be "dangerous" or "harmful", but used correctly serve the church positively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron,  Yes, that is what I mean.  Creeds,used incorrectly, could be &#8220;dangerous&#8221; or &#8220;harmful&#8221;, but used correctly serve the church positively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Snell</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/creedal-conclusion/#comment-16472</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/creedal-conclusion/#comment-16472</guid>
		<description>Oh, wait, I think I see what you were saying - that there is a danger, but not a great enough one to justify the rejection of creeds per se.  Is that what you meant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, wait, I think I see what you were saying - that there is a danger, but not a great enough one to justify the rejection of creeds per se.  Is that what you meant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Snell</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/creedal-conclusion/#comment-16471</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/creedal-conclusion/#comment-16471</guid>
		<description>Barry, 
You wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Is there any inherent danger in creedal Christianity? I think the obvious answer is yes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Did you mean no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry,<br />
You wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Is there any inherent danger in creedal Christianity? I think the obvious answer is yes.</p></blockquote>
<p>Did you mean no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Winters</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/creedal-conclusion/#comment-16465</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Winters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2007/creedal-conclusion/#comment-16465</guid>
		<description>One of my questions, then, is where do we find the neo-Aristotelian metaphysic on which the Nicene creed depends in scripture? Where do we find the validation of &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; metaphysic in scripture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my questions, then, is where do we find the neo-Aristotelian metaphysic on which the Nicene creed depends in scripture? Where do we find the validation of <i>any</i> metaphysic in scripture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
