What is Postmodernism?

Filed under: Philosophy — Barry Carey at 11:03 am on Tuesday, May 2, 2006

A few days ago I posted A Parable of Human Existence which referenced postmodernism and its denial of the existence of absolute truth. Kevin, a studier and advocate of the philosophy of Heidegger, and Jeremy, my son and the other contributor to this site, had an interesting conversation in the comments on the blog. I appreciate the insightful responses of both. Given the nature of the comments, I thought I might post a few thoughts on postmodernism in general. What is it? Can we use the term meaningfully? This blog has a varied readership, from those who have considerable training in philosophy to those who have little. It can be sometimes difficult to know at what level we may most effectively communicate. As stated on our main page, we want to help people think critically and consistently about the things that really do make a difference. It is with that goal in mind that I discuss postmodernism.

J. P. Moreland and William Lane Craig discuss postmodernism in their book, Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview. It is from that book that I have primarily gathered information for this post. As discussed by Kevin and Jeremy, postmodernism can be difficult to analyze and discuss in a brief way (such as in a blog). A major reason for this is that postmodernism encompasses many diverse thinkers from many different academic disciplines. It is difficult to be fair given all that diversity. However, one may still speak of postmodernism in general as there are common themes. Having said this, and granting the points of Jeremy and Kevin, it would be wrong to attribute to any individual thinker every aspect of what one might consider postmodernist thought.

Craig and Moreland assert that postmodernism must be understood as both a historical notion and a philosophical ideology. Historically, postmodernism chronologically follows a period known as modernity. Modernity is a period of European thought beginning with the Renaissance (14th-17th centuries) and flourishing with the Englightenment (17th-19th) centuries. Thinkers of modernity include Descartes, Locke, Hume, Berkeley, Leibniz and Kant. This historical and chronological characterization of postmodernism is guilty of oversimplifying the thought of the above men. Much of the thought of men like Kant, Hume, and others is more characteristic of what we might think as postmodern rather than modern. Nevertheless, we can think in some general way about the postmodern period following after the modern period.

Philosophically, and more interestingly, Craig and Moreland had this to say about postmodernism:

…Postmodernism is primarily a reinterpretation of what knowledge is and what counts as knowledge. More broadly, it represents a form of cultural relativism about such things as reality, truth, reason, value, linguistic meaning, the self and other notions.

We often think of the great postmodern philosophers to include men such as Friedrich Nietzsche, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Jacques Derrida, Thomas Kuhn, Michel Foucault, Martin Heidegger and Jean-Francois Lyotard. I will continue to discuss postmodernism in the next few blogs.

8 Comments »

353

Comment by Kevin Winters

May 2, 2006 @ 11:54 am

Wow, people are actually talking about me on other blogs! Cool!

Ok . Let me say that I’m not a big fan of Moreland/Craig’s discussion of postmodernism in Philosophical Foundations. In fact, it was reading their simplistic generalizations that got me on my ‘quest’ to help Evangelicals see that at least most of the well-known so-called ‘postmodernists’ (Heidegger, Derrida, etc.) don’t even believe most of what Moreland/Craig say, if at all. That’s why I think it’s a useless term: it’s a blanket statement that has little meaning and, as such, it obscures matters more than it helps.

Not only that, the way it is commonly talked about within Evangelical circles provides it with ’shock value.’ I’ve talked with people who, hearing me talk about Heidegger, immediately pigeonhole me into their over-generalized notion of ‘postmodernism’ and thereby make talking to them impossible. Anything I say is filtered through their preconceptions and anything I do say that is contrary to their preconceptions is ‘filtered out’ and ignored. In short, I become a two-dimensional figure whose entire thought can be reduced to their preconceptions. As anyone should know, that is a horrible hermenutical practice, not to mention quite frustrating for me. By all means reject my views, but at least have the charity to get it right before you reject it! I’m not of the mind to think that by understanding my view you are thereby logically bound to accept it, for fear of being labeled ‘illogical’ or ‘irrational.’

That is the source of my frustration: this abuse of the term, which is very different from the term’s meaning at its inception, makes discussion impossible. And this has happened to me on many occasions; it is not a fluke, but a common occurance. Lastly, and not saying this to degrade Biola, its program, or its students in any way, it often happens with Biola philosophy/apologetic students. Moreland has described postmodernism as a “form of intellectual pacifism…the easy, cowardly way out that removes the pressure to engage alternative conceptual schemes, to be different, to risk ridicule, to take a stand outside the gate” (”Truth, Contemporary Philosophy, and the Postmodern Turn” [November 18, 2004], presentation at the Evangelical Theological Society). While I will say at the outset that I find that designation to be incredibly insulting, I wonder at those Evangelicals who think they can defeat the whole of postmodernism by simply invoking the principle of non-contradiction; how much “pressure to engage alternative conceptual schemes” does that aleviate? Hence my call: address individual postmodernists and stop attacking overgeneralized straw men.

:o)

354

Comment by Barry Carey

May 2, 2006 @ 12:03 pm

Kevin, I look forward to hearing more of your responses as I post a few more blogs. As I did point out, it is unfair to paint any individual with a broad brush concerning what they believe postmodernism to entail. Therefore, I look forward to some of your comments and clarifications on assertions I (as well as Moreland and Craig) might make. Then we may discuss the particulars of your thought. It will be more fruitful to discuss individual issues rather than discuss a general mischaracterization of postmodernist individuals. It is obvious from looking at your site that you do read excellent articles by well-respected evangelical philosophers such as those who write for Philosophia Christi. Thanks for your interaction.

355

Comment by Kevin Winters

May 2, 2006 @ 12:26 pm

Barry, I’m glad to discuss. As a warning, I can get a little passionate about this (it is, after all, one of my ’soap box topics’). So, if I get too passionate or push my pet theories too much, just let me know and I’ll back off. Either way, thanks for the welcome.

357

Comment by Barry Carey

May 2, 2006 @ 3:54 pm

Kevin, Passion is welcome and encouraged especially when accompanied by the respect and courtesy you display.

365

Comment by Kevin Winters

May 3, 2006 @ 6:01 pm

In case you are interested, I’ve changed locations for my blog. You can find my new blog here. I mention it mostly because my first official post deals with the question, What Good is Philosophy?, mentioning ‘postmodernism’ and how Heidegger approaches this question. As it is pertinent to this entry, thought I’d mention it.

367

Comment by Barry Carey

May 4, 2006 @ 1:08 am

Kevin, I read your post. Very nice. I tried to comment, but it seemed as if I had to have a blog with blogspot to comment. In registering to comment I was instructed to sign up for a blog. This is all probably very simple and I’ll feel quite stupid, but do I have to do all that?

373

Comment by Kevin Winters

May 4, 2006 @ 11:32 am

Barry, you shouldn’t have to register with Blogger. There should be an option for ‘guests.’ If you can’t do it again, let me know and I’ll see if I can track down the problem.

Pingback by withallyourmind.net » Postmodernism and Reality

June 21, 2006 @ 5:18 pm

[...] I began a series on postmodernism on May 2, and haven’t been able to return to it until now. It might be helpful to read that post, before reading this one. I will spend the first few blogs discussing what postmodernism is, then will offer some critique of its positions. [...]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>