Sola Scriptura and Reason

Filed under: Apologetics — Barry Carey at 10:03 pm on Saturday, March 18, 2006

I have been conversing with several other folks about the best approach to share the truth of Christ with the world. The role of natural law and philosophy has surfaced repeatedly. There is one person who believes that it is wrong, or at least ineffective, for a believer to appeal to natural law or other philosophical arguments in support of the fundamentals of the Christian doctrine and worldview. His motto is “Sola Scriptura”!

“Sola Scriptura” (Latin: By Scripture Alone) is a famous latin phrase which was an important slogan of the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century. Adherents to this slogan (which would probably include most of the evangelical world) believe that it is scripture alone which is the inerrant rule for Christian faith and morals. This belief reversed the entrenched authority of the Catholic church to interpret scripture for the believer. The traditions of the Church were not to be the ultimate authority, but the individual believer was to look to scripture alone as a guide to his faith. It did not, however, reject all church tradition as being worthless to a Christian. Instead of church tradition interpreting scripture, scripture was to interpret tradition. In the words of John Wesley, “The Church is to be judged by the Scriptures, not the Scriptures by the Church.”

This brings me to my point. Sola Scriptura does not imply a rejection of reason, natural law, or philosophy. How does the individual interpret scripture? He must do so by use of his reason! Reason is not in conflict with scripture, but is God’s gift to humanity to understand and properly relate to Him. J. P. Moreland, in his influential book, Love Your God With All Your Mind, made this statement:

The Christian mind is committed to seeking and finding the truth even if that truth is not what one wanted to hear. The Christian seeks to know and do the truth. In fact, in a certain sense the believer’s commitment to the truth is even more basic than his or her dedication to the Christian faith in general or some doctrinal position in particular. If one came to believe that Christianity or some doctrinal belief were false, then one ought to give up the belief in question.

Proper reasoning is how we come to recognize truth from error. Now, the Scripture tells us much that we could not know otherwise, for example, that God was manifest in flesh in order to make a substitutionary sacrifice for those who believe, or that we are saved by grace through faith and not by works. We need the Bible, and we need to understand that it is the ultimate authority regarding our lives and faith. But there is much truth we can know without ever having read scripture by simply using the reason God has given us. That same reason also enables us to interpret scripture correctly. God’s general revelation and his special revelation (scripture) are not in conflict. Reason and scripture both point us to God’s wonderful truth.

6 Comments »

181

Comment by Tim

March 22, 2006 @ 4:26 pm

“The traditions of the Church were not to be the ultimate authority, but the individual believer was to look to scripture alone as a guide to his faith. It did not, however, reject all church tradition as being worthless to a Christian. Instead of church tradition interpreting scripture, scripture was to interpret tradition.”

It seems like one is arbitrarily picking where and when tradition can play a role. I don’t see where one would support their argument that what the RCC does is incorrect.
Also, instead of ‘tradition interpreting scripture, scripture was to interpret tradition’ what about the years before the scripture was copied down? After the events of Christ?

Question, do you believe Catholics are Christian?

182

Comment by Jerucherub

March 22, 2006 @ 7:16 pm

I agree with using reason to finding truth in Gods word. Without reason, how would you come to the knowledge that brings conviction? You must know what you “see” in scripture or you are just following tradition. Tradition brings spiritual death. Many friends I know depend completely on their leaders for every scrap of “knowledge” and are just as infantile as they were when they were converted. As Paul said, ..” I would that I could give you meat, but you were unable to bear it,”
We need to have a knowledge of the time period when the scripure was written, the culture, the style of writing and the thought process people of that time period were accustomed too. However, I also give a warning on the “thought” of man. Mans thought tends to gravitate toward carnal things and away from spiritual things. Philosophy down thru the ages was usually taken as truth by people of that specific age, such as Aristotle, Plato and others. However many of their “truths” have been disproven by science or other discoverys. For example, many great thinkers felt that the world was flat and that we were the center of the universe. Time has proven them wrong. Their reasoning went outside the word, because the word is specific in saying that the world is round and is hung on nothing. When you go outside the word with carnal reasoning, you will run into problems. Once you consider yourself “learned”, then instead of realizing you are wrong in your thought process because the Bible doesnt agree with you, then the Bible seems to be wrong. The Bible cannot and shall never be wrong. We who use reason to interpret the Bible have to learn when our own reasoning falls so very short.
Terry

183

Comment by Barry Carey

March 23, 2006 @ 12:23 am

Tim, Thanks so much for your comments. Do I consider Catholics Christian? I believe that there are Christian Catholics, Christian Baptists, Christian Pentecostals, and so on. I do not believe that one becomes a Christian by affiliating with a certain group. Being a Christian is, firstly, a personal thing. It is based on one’s recognition of his sin, his utter dependence upon God for salvation, and his acceptance of the lordship of Christ in his life. There are many Catholics who have done this, and yes, I would believe they are Christians. Is that a satisfactory answer?

184

Comment by Barry Carey

March 23, 2006 @ 12:26 am

Terry, Thanks for responding to my post. You are certainly correct in pointing out the fallibility of man’s reason. Reason can be subverted by the will and carnal desires. The problem lies not in reason, but in the sinfulness of man.

186

Comment by Tim

March 23, 2006 @ 11:20 am

Thanks for the response, Barry.

I’ve recently came to Christianity…. The majority of my life I was an indifferent Christian, I don’t want to say agnostic, because I believed there was more than likely a God. I would have best been described as an optimistic deist who was fairly insultive to Christianity in general.
However, through a series of events starting around 1999 and 2003-2004 I started to develop a much stronger relationship with Jesus. I found alot of fulfillment from this decision (spiritually and intellectually). Alot of my friends and relatives were very happy for me. For my own reasons I opted to persue my Christianity through Catholicism.
Not being very aware of some of the animosity between the differing branches (because prior to that period I never really cared in general) I would tell these friends and relatives that I was going to start attending a Catholic church. I quickly noticed a pattern. They went from “congratulations!” to “you’re doing it all wrong”. My friends and relatives could be broken down into certain categories as Lutheran (general), WELS Lutheran, and faith-free evangelical. The attitude that I received from them was one of arrogant criticism towards Catholicism. Worse than that, many of them made it out to see as ‘if you are a Catholic believing what Catholics believe…. even if you believe you have a strong/positive relationship with Jesus Christ, that’s not good enough, you won’t be saved’. Then they would (usually) make comments about the differences and why ‘Catholics have it all wrong’.

Many times I would just get frustrated. I would start thinking, “If the God of Christianity is this particular over these seemingly not-as-relevant issues…. then maybe Christianity in general is just too esoteric for me”.
The pattern seems to persist. Thanks for being patient with my initial post. Alot of times I find myself assuming that there is this disdain for Catholics in general (and what they believe in particular), maybe that’s what motivated my intial post. I apologize for inferring something that might not have been present.

187

Comment by Barry Carey

March 23, 2006 @ 3:01 pm

Tim, Great Testimony! I am so thankful for the grace of God! If it were up to men, no one could be saved. Keep searching after God! Thanks. Barry

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>