Paul’s Conversion and the Resurrection

Filed under: Apologetics — Barry Carey at 9:15 am on Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Today, I continue my summary of Gary Habermas’ minimal facts argument for the historicity of the resurrection as presented in The Risen Jesus & Future Hope. The sixth fact which is conceded by almost all scholars is Saul’s conversion due to his experience which he believed was an appearance of the risen Jesus.

Saul of Tarsus was a zealous Jew who was aggressively fighting against the Christian message, when suddenly he was converted and transformed while on the way to Damascus. What brought about this transformation was what Paul believed was an appearance of the resurrected Jesus. Non-Pauline confirmation of this story is presented in Act 9:1-9; 22:1-11; 26:9-19. Paul himself testifies to this encounter more than once:

1 Corinthians 9:1 - Am I not free? Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are not you my workmanship in the Lord?

1 Corinthians 15:8 - Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me.

Galatians 1:14-17 - And I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my own age among my people, so extremely zealous was I for the traditions of my fathers. But when he who had set me apart before I was born, and who called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son to me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately consult with anyone; nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me, but I went away into Arabia, and returned again to Damascus.

(All scripture from the ESV.)

Such a dramatic turn-around requires an equally dramatic explanation. Paul provides the answer: He claims to have seen the risen Jesus. That transformed his life to the point that he eventually gave his life for that message.

Next, a summation of the minimal facts argument.

1 Comment »

Pingback by withallyourmind.net » Summary of the Minimal Facts Argument for the Resurrection

August 23, 2006 @ 1:08 pm

[…] Over 9 previous posts, I have presented Gary Habermas’ Minimal Facts Argument for the resurrection (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9). I first presented 12 facts which are accepted as historical by virtually all scholars who research in this area. Those 12 facts were then pared to 6 minimal facts which are sufficient to establish the resurrection as an historical event. This argument does not depend upon being granted the inerrancy of scripture, divine inspiration of scripture, nor even the general reliability of the Old Testament. Obviously, I do hold to all of the above, but I do not need to depend on those assumptions nor be granted them to establish firm grounds for believing that the resurrection actually occurred. […]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>