Concerning “Concerning Slavery”

Filed under: Apologetics — Barry Carey at 7:23 pm on Wednesday, May 10, 2006

The previous post, as I’m sure most have surmised, does not represent my views concerning slavery. The argument was offered to point out the absurdity of what falls from the lips of certain politicians, especially around election time. How many times have we heard the candidate explain that he/she personally is against abortion, but does not think it is appropriate to impose their personal views on others. John Kerry, for example, admitted that he believed life began at conception and that abortion is wrong, but he could not impose his own views on others. So, let’s get this right…I believe that the fetus is a human life and it is immoral to take an innocent human life. However, if you think it is moral, that’s okay!

To believe something is to take that proposition as being true. A belief is not some nebulous entity which has no meaning. For example, if I believe that it is raining outside, I will take an umbrella to protect myself from the rain. I believe it really is raining. If one believes that abortion is the taking of an innocent human life, he really believes that it is so. Do these politicians and other ordinary Americans realize the absurdity of their statement? “I believe this is immoral, but if you want to believe it is moral, go ahead. It would be wrong for me to impose my sense of morality on you.”

I know of no one (there may be some) who would agree with my argument concerning slavery. If it is immoral for one human being to own another human being as property, it is immoral. It’s not moral for me and immoral for you. If you believe it is immmoral for me to torture children for fun, but I believe it is moral to do so, am I justified in my actions? According to Kerry, (by the way, there are Republican politicians to make similar statements so this is not anti-Democrat) I have no right to stop someone else from doing something I feel is immoral if they feel otherwise. So…let’s bring back slavery!

No, let’s not! Let’s be honest about our beliefs. And if we believe something, let’s stand up for it. Those who take the abortion stance previously discussed either lie about their beliefs or must be willing to allow any action by any individual as long as he thinks it is moral.

3 Comments »

451

Comment by Holopupenko

May 11, 2006 @ 2:55 am

Barry:
     Spot on! I highlighted your point from the “moral relativism” perspective, but I also believe it’s important to understand that your point is a species of — and thus supports — the broader SRA issue as presented in a recent post at Fides Quaerens Intellectum (http://blog.johndepoe.com/?p=84).
     Keep up the good work!

455

Comment by Holopupenko

May 11, 2006 @ 3:40 am

Hi again Barry:
     The moral relativism and SRA stuff (in the best traditions of cognitive dissonance) are ubiquitous on the international scene: see “Experts Warn: Amnesty International’s Support Of Abortion As ‘Human Right’ Will Undercut Group’s Credibility” (http://www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=67485). Ironically, Amnesty International will monitor the human rights compliance of the 47 member states of the newly-formed U.N. Human Rights Council—which includes such moral illuminaries as Russia, China, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, and Cuba.
     Finally, check out the new “Google Trends” option (http://www.google.com/trends) and notice that one of the biggest search trends is for “good, evil” (the regional breakdown referenced to news events is fascinating)… which (I hope) means people haven’t lost the distinction between these at a deeper level.
     Cheers

462

Comment by Barry Carey

May 11, 2006 @ 7:16 am

Thanks for the compliments.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 
4294967295