<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concerning &#8220;Concerning Slavery&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2006/concerning-concerning-slavery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2006/concerning-concerning-slavery/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barry Carey</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2006/concerning-concerning-slavery/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 11:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2006/concerning-concerning-slavery/#comment-462</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the compliments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the compliments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holopupenko</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2006/concerning-concerning-slavery/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Holopupenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 07:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2006/concerning-concerning-slavery/#comment-455</guid>
		<description>Hi again Barry:
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;The moral relativism and SRA stuff (in the best traditions of cognitive dissonance) are ubiquitous on the international scene: see â€œExperts Warn: Amnesty Internationalâ€™s Support Of Abortion As â€˜Human Rightâ€™ Will Undercut Groupâ€™s Credibilityâ€ (http://www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=67485). Ironically, Amnesty International will monitor the human rights compliance of the 47 member states of the newly-formed U.N. Human Rights Councilâ€”which includes such moral illuminaries as Russia, China, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, and Cuba.
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Finally, check out the new â€œGoogle Trendsâ€ option (http://www.google.com/trends) and notice that one of the biggest search trends is for â€œgood, evilâ€ (the regional breakdown referenced to news events is fascinating)â€¦ which (I hope) means people havenâ€™t lost the distinction between these at a deeper level.
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again Barry:<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The moral relativism and SRA stuff (in the best traditions of cognitive dissonance) are ubiquitous on the international scene: see â€œExperts Warn: Amnesty Internationalâ€™s Support Of Abortion As â€˜Human Rightâ€™ Will Undercut Groupâ€™s Credibilityâ€ (http://www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=67485). Ironically, Amnesty International will monitor the human rights compliance of the 47 member states of the newly-formed U.N. Human Rights Councilâ€”which includes such moral illuminaries as Russia, China, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, and Cuba.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Finally, check out the new â€œGoogle Trendsâ€ option (http://www.google.com/trends) and notice that one of the biggest search trends is for â€œgood, evilâ€ (the regional breakdown referenced to news events is fascinating)â€¦ which (I hope) means people havenâ€™t lost the distinction between these at a deeper level.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holopupenko</title>
		<link>http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2006/concerning-concerning-slavery/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Holopupenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 06:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withallyourmind.net/archives/2006/concerning-concerning-slavery/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Barry:
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Spot on! I highlighted your point from the "moral relativism" perspective, but I also believe it's important to understand that your point is a species of -- and thus supports -- the broader SRA issue as presented in a recent post at Fides Quaerens Intellectum (http://blog.johndepoe.com/?p=84).
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry:<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Spot on! I highlighted your point from the &#8220;moral relativism&#8221; perspective, but I also believe it&#8217;s important to understand that your point is a species of &#8212; and thus supports &#8212; the broader SRA issue as presented in a recent post at Fides Quaerens Intellectum (http://blog.johndepoe.com/?p=84).<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		4294967295