Are You a “Religious” Person?

Filed under: Apologetics, Philosophy — Barry Carey at 12:48 pm on Tuesday, November 28, 2006

We often encounter surveys and polls attempting to describe the state of religious belief and spirituality in America. I like Phillip Johnson’s approach to the question, “Are you a religious person?” This is too broad a question to which to accurately respond. It could mean almost anything. But most importantly, to the modern mind it means that you possess some subjective feelings. It means you have certain “beliefs” about non-material things. The next time someone questions me about my religious beliefs, I hope to claim that I am a theistic realist.

To claim to be a theistic realist is to communicate that you not only believe in God, but that you believe that he is objectively real. I deny living half of my life in some sort of fantasy world which I lay aside to function in the real world. The real world does contain an objective reality called God. As Johnson says, this is a shocking proposition to many people. It is arrogant to claim that you have some knowledge other than that which comes from naturalism.

Saddeningly, it is not just the secularists which hold to naturalism. Many contemporary “Christians” and clergy do not hold to theistic realism, but instead have capitulated to the naturalistic worldview.

2 Comments »

Comment by havoc

November 29, 2006 @ 11:11 am

I only differ in that I do not claim that I have some knowledge which is wholly exclusive of naturalism. I can make inferences. From naturalism, logic, math, observation and philosophy I have very strong reasons to infer that there is a God. I can look at the historicity of the New Testament and conclude that they are real and reliable, that Jesus was a real person in a real body who did and said real things which have been passed down reliably. None of this is supernatural — even the secular historians plainly record “wonders.”

I can look to the best science which says the universe started some 12-15 billion years ago with a very finely tuned, finite beginning (i.e. “big bang”), and I can conclude that whatever caused that was, by definition, super natural (because whatever caused it was beyond the universe… beyond nature).

I can, furthermore, test the creation stories of all religions, and I find that only the Genesis account is the least similar to the big bang theory, and I find that it would be an accurate description for an author writing 3400 years before the discovery of the expanding universe.

Trackback by Architecture Update

December 1, 2006 @ 5:11 am

Are You a “Religious” Person?

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>